Court case

Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation

In 2021 the Court held Alaska Native Corporations count as "Indian tribes" under federal law and could share CARES Act relief money.

Citation
594 U.S. 338 (2021), No. 20-543
Court
U.S. Supreme Court
Year
2021
Nations
Alaska Native Corporations (ANCSA); Chehalis and other tribes
Treaty at issue
none (ANCSA 1971)
Effect on land rights
procedural

What happened

Title V of the CARES Act, passed in response to COVID-19, allocated $8 billion to "Tribal governments" to compensate for unbudgeted expenditures. The question was whether Alaska Native Corporations (ANCs) could receive any of it.

The Act defines a tribal government by reference to the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (ISDA). ISDA defines an "Indian tribe" to include "any Alaska Native village or regional or village corporation as defined in or established pursuant to" the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA), "which is recognized as eligible for the special programs and services provided by the United States to Indians because of their status as Indians."

The Treasury Department decided that ANCs were eligible, even though ANCs are not federally recognized tribes, meaning tribes with which the United States has a government-to-government relationship. A number of federally recognized tribes sued. The district court sided with Treasury and the ANCs, but the D.C. Circuit reversed.

On June 25, 2021, the Supreme Court reversed that ruling. Justice Sotomayor wrote that ANCs are "established pursuant to" ANCSA and thereby "recognized as eligible" for its benefits. ANCSA, the Court noted, made ANCs eligible to select tens of millions of acres of land and receive hundreds of millions of tax-exempt dollars. The Court rejected the tribes' argument that the phrase means "federally recognized tribe." Justice Gorsuch dissented, joined by Justices Thomas and Kagan.

Summarized with AI assistance from 3 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error

What the sources say, and how this was checked

Well supported by the sources below.

  1. ANCs are “Indian tribe[s]” under ISDA and thus eligible for funding under Title V of the CARES Act.Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation, 594 U.S. 338 (2021) (Supreme Court of the United States, slip opinion)
  2. ANCs are “established pursuant to” ANCSA and thereby “recognized as eligible” for that Act’s benefitsYellen v. Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation, 594 U.S. 338 (2021) (Supreme Court of the United States, slip opinion)
  3. even though ANCs are not “federally recognized tribes”Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation, 594 U.S. 338 (2021) (Supreme Court of the United States, slip opinion)

Research notes. The reporter cite 594 U.S. 338 on the page is not in the slip opinion (594 U.S. ___); No. 20-543 and the June 25, 2021 date are confirmed. The vote was 6-3 with Justice Alito joining only parts of the majority opinion. The closing line about ANCSA and Alaska v. Venetie was removed as unsourced.

Who is doing the work

Working with these nations

Native legal and land defense, nationally

Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.

Connections

Links marked “suggested” were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.

Doctrine applied 2

Policy era 1

Nations named 1

Sources

  1. supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/594/20-543/legal text copy
The record’s fields
Holding
Alaska Native regional and village corporations are 'Indian tribes' under ISDEAA for CARES Act Title V funds; ANCSA eligibility satisfies the 'recognized as eligible' clause. 6-3.
Kind
Court case
Confidence
High

Correct this record