Court case
Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation
In 2021 the Court held Alaska Native Corporations count as "Indian tribes" under federal law and could share CARES Act relief money.
- Citation
- 594 U.S. 338 (2021), No. 20-543
- Court
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Year
- 2021
- Nations
- Alaska Native Corporations (ANCSA); Chehalis and other tribes
- Treaty at issue
- none (ANCSA 1971)
- Effect on land rights
- procedural
What happened
Title V of the CARES Act, passed in response to COVID-19, allocated $8 billion to "Tribal governments" to compensate for unbudgeted expenditures. The question was whether Alaska Native Corporations (ANCs) could receive any of it.
The Act defines a tribal government by reference to the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (ISDA). ISDA defines an "Indian tribe" to include "any Alaska Native village or regional or village corporation as defined in or established pursuant to" the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA), "which is recognized as eligible for the special programs and services provided by the United States to Indians because of their status as Indians."
The Treasury Department decided that ANCs were eligible, even though ANCs are not federally recognized tribes, meaning tribes with which the United States has a government-to-government relationship. A number of federally recognized tribes sued. The district court sided with Treasury and the ANCs, but the D.C. Circuit reversed.
On June 25, 2021, the Supreme Court reversed that ruling. Justice Sotomayor wrote that ANCs are "established pursuant to" ANCSA and thereby "recognized as eligible" for its benefits. ANCSA, the Court noted, made ANCs eligible to select tens of millions of acres of land and receive hundreds of millions of tax-exempt dollars. The Court rejected the tribes' argument that the phrase means "federally recognized tribe." Justice Gorsuch dissented, joined by Justices Thomas and Kagan.
Summarized with AI assistance from 3 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error
What the sources say, and how this was checked
Well supported by the sources below.
ANCs are “Indian tribe[s]” under ISDA and thus eligible for funding under Title V of the CARES Act.
Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation, 594 U.S. 338 (2021) (Supreme Court of the United States, slip opinion)ANCs are “established pursuant to” ANCSA and thereby “recognized as eligible” for that Act’s benefits
Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation, 594 U.S. 338 (2021) (Supreme Court of the United States, slip opinion)even though ANCs are not “federally recognized tribes”
Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation, 594 U.S. 338 (2021) (Supreme Court of the United States, slip opinion)
Research notes. The reporter cite 594 U.S. 338 on the page is not in the slip opinion (594 U.S. ___); No. 20-543 and the June 25, 2021 date are confirmed. The vote was 6-3 with Justice Alito joining only parts of the majority opinion. The closing line about ANCSA and Alaska v. Venetie was removed as unsourced.
Who is doing the work
Working with these nations
- United Tribes of Bristol Bay (UTBB) Nation government Long-term guardianship of lands, air and waters, Tribal self-determination Give on their site Website
- Native Conservancy (Cordova, Alaska) Native-led LandBack, OceanBack and PeopleBack programs: Native-led conservation trusts, regenerative mariculture, return of… Give on their site Website
- Native Movement (Alaska) Native-led Indigenous rights, environmental justice, food sovereignty and grassroots organizing (not a land buyer) Give on their site Website
- Spruce Root (Seacoast Trust / Sustainable Southeast Partnership) Native-led Indigenous-led conservation funding: Indigenous Guardians, community forest partnerships, food sovereignty in… Give on their site Website
Native legal and land defense, nationally
- Native American Rights Fund (NARF) Native-led Litigation and legal advocacy for tribal sovereignty, treaty rights, land and resources Give on their site Website
- NDN Collective (LANDBACK Campaign) Native-led LANDBACK campaign (launched 2020; Mount Rushmore closure and return of Black Hills public lands), Indigenous… Give on their site Website
- Indian Land Tenure Foundation (ILTF) Native-led Land recovery and control by tribes and individual Indian landowners Website
- Decolonizing Wealth Project (Indigenous Earth Fund; California Tribal Land Return) Native-led Reparative philanthropy Give on their site Website
Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.
Connections
Links marked “suggested” were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.
Doctrine applied 2
Policy era 1
Nations named 1
- Alaska Native peoplessuggested
Sources
- supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/594/20-543/legal text copy
The record’s fields
- Holding
- Alaska Native regional and village corporations are 'Indian tribes' under ISDEAA for CARES Act Title V funds; ANCSA eligibility satisfies the 'recognized as eligible' clause. 6-3.
- Kind
- Court case
- Confidence
- High