Court case

United States v. Winans

In 1905 the Court held the Yakima treaty's fishing right was reserved by the Indians, not granted, and burdened land later patented to others.

Citation
198 U.S. 371 (1905)
Court
U.S. Supreme Court
Year
1905
Nations
Yakama Nation
Treaty at issue
Treaty of 1855 with the Yakama (12 Stat. 951)
Effect on land rights
advanced

What happened

In a treaty between the United States and the Yakima Nation, the confederated tribes and bands ceded the lands they occupied. They kept a reservation and reserved "the right of taking fish at all usual and accustomed places, in common with citizens of the Territory," along with the right to erect temporary buildings for curing the fish. The treaty was signed on June 9, 1855 and ratified and proclaimed in 1859 (12 Stat. 951). The Supreme Court's opinion refers to it as the treaty "made in 1859."

The United States sued to stop Winans and other landowners from obstructing Yakima Indians from fishing on the Columbia River in Washington. The respondents held land along the river under federal patents and state grants, and had state licenses to maintain fish wheels. They argued the treaty gave the Indians only the rights a white man would have under the conditions of land ownership along the river.

On May 15, 1905, Justice McKenna wrote for the Court that it would "construe a treaty with Indians as they understood it" and as justice and reason demand. The fishing right, the Court said, was a "reservation by the Indians of rights already possessed and not granted away by them," not a grant to them.

The Court held that the reserved rights imposed a servitude on the entire land relinquished to the United States, continuing against the United States and its grantees and against the State and its grantees. After admission to the Union, it said, Washington could not disregard the right on the ground of its equal footing with the original States.

Good to know. The opinion calls it 'the treaty of 1859'; the treaty was signed June 9, 1855 and ratified and proclaimed in 1859.

Summarized with AI assistance from 3 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error

What the sources say, and how this was checked

Well supported by the sources below.

  1. a reservation by the Indians of rights already possessed and not granted away by themUnited States v. Winans, 198 U.S. 371 (1905) (U.S. Reports, Library of Congress)
  2. The rights so reserved imposed a servitude on the entire land relinquished to the United States under the treatyUnited States v. Winans, 198 U.S. 371 (1905) (U.S. Reports, Library of Congress)
  3. Treaty of June 9, 1855, with the Yakima Tribe (12 Stat. 951)Sohappy v. Smith, 302 F. Supp. 899 (D. Or. 1969) (case.law)

Research notes. The opinion and syllabus call it "the treaty of 1859"; the Sohappy opinion dates the treaty June 9, 1855 and says it was ratified and proclaimed in 1859 (12 Stat. 951), so the atlas page's "Treaty of 1855" is consistent. The LoC text of this opinion has OCR errors; quotes are from the legible syllabus lines. The old phrase "famous phrase" and the later cases list (Tulee, Puyallup, Fishing Vessel) were removed as unsourced here.

Treaty under documented pressureShapes from the 1899 federal record: approximate, not legal boundaries.

Who is doing the work

This history belongs to living nations. Start with them:

Native legal and land defense, nationally

Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.

Connections

Links marked “suggested” were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.

Doctrine applied 3

Concerns the instrument 1

Policy era 1

Nations named 1

Decided a dispute over 1

Sources

  1. supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/198/371/legal text copy
The record’s fields
Holding
The treaty right to fish at usual and accustomed places was a right reserved by the Yakama from land they ceded, not a grant to them; it burdened the ceded land against the United States' grantees and the state, and statehood did not extinguish it.
Kind
Court case
Confidence
High

Correct this record