Court case

Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe

The Jicarilla Apache Tribe has inherent power to tax oil and gas companies extracting minerals from its reservation.

Citation
455 U.S. 130 (1982)
Court
U.S. Supreme Court
Year
1982
Nations
Jicarilla Apache Nation
Treaty at issue
none
Effect on land rights
advanced

What happened

The Jicarilla Apache Tribe lives on a reservation in northwestern New Mexico. It was established by Executive Order in 1887 and contains 742,315 acres, all held as tribal trust property. The Tribe adopted a Revised Constitution, approved by the Secretary of the Interior as required by the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934. Under it, the Tribe enacted an ordinance, also approved by the Secretary, imposing a severance tax on oil and natural gas severed, saved and removed from tribal lands.

Petitioners were 21 lessees that extract and produce oil and gas from the reservation under long-term leases with the Tribe. They challenged the tax, along with a second group of oil companies that included Amoco. The federal district court concluded the Tribe lacked the power to impose it, that only state and local authorities could tax oil and gas production on Indian reservations, and that the tax violated the Commerce Clause. The Tenth Circuit reversed.

The Supreme Court, 6-3, affirmed in an opinion by Justice Marshall. It held that "the power to tax is an essential attribute of Indian sovereignty because it is a necessary instrument of self-government and territorial management." Even if the power derived only from the Tribe's power to exclude non-Indians from the reservation, the Tribe could impose this tax. The Court also held that Congress had not taken the power away, and that the tax did not violate the Commerce Clause. Justice Stevens dissented, joined by the Chief Justice and Justice Rehnquist.

Summarized with AI assistance from 3 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error

What the sources say, and how this was checked

Well supported by the sources below.

  1. The power to tax is an essential attribute of Indian sovereignty because it is a necessary instrument of self-government and territorial management.Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe, 455 U.S. 130 (1982) (U.S. Reports, Library of Congress)
  2. The Tribe has the inherent power to impose the severance tax on petitioners' mining activitiesMerrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe, 455 U.S. 130 (1982) (U.S. Reports, Library of Congress)
  3. the reservation contains 742,315 acres, all of which are held as tribal trust propertyMerrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe, 455 U.S. 130 (1982) (U.S. Reports, Library of Congress)

Research notes. The old text compared Merrion to Montana v. United States and Atkinson Trading (2001); Atkinson is not in the sources opened and was removed. The 6-3 split is from the U.S. Reports headnote. The opinion's account is about a tribal tax on mineral extraction on trust land.

Who is doing the work

This history belongs to living nations. Start with them:

Native legal and land defense, nationally

Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.

Connections

Links marked “suggested” were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.

Doctrine applied 2

Policy era 1

Nations named 1

Sources

  1. supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/455/130/legal text copy
The record’s fields
Holding
The Tribe may impose a severance tax on non-Indian lessees' oil and gas production on the reservation as an inherent attribute of sovereignty tied to the power to exclude.
Kind
Court case
Confidence
High

Correct this record