Court case
Jones v. Meehan
A treaty can itself grant individual land in fee to a chief, with no later act of Congress or patent, the Court held.
- Citation
- 175 U.S. 1 (1899)
- Court
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Year
- 1899
- Nations
- Chippewa (Red Lake and Pembina bands)
- Treaty at issue
- Treaty of 1863 (Old Crossing)
- Effect on land rights
- advanced
What happened
In article 9 of the treaty made at the Old Crossing of Red Lake River on October 2, 1863, between the United States and the Red Lake and Pembina bands of Chippewa, the bands ceded a large tract of country. The treaty provided that "there shall be set apart from the tract hereby ceded a reservation of six hundred and forty acres near the mouth of the Thief River for the chief Moose Dung."
The elder Moose Dung lived on that land at the mouth of Thief River. He died in 1872, before the land was surveyed, and his eldest son, Moose Dung the younger, succeeded him as chief. In 1891 the younger Moose Dung leased a strip of the land to Patrick and James Meehan for ten years. Ray Jones claimed under a later lease. On August 4, 1894, Congress passed a joint resolution authorizing the Secretary of the Interior to approve it, and the Secretary did so on December 27, 1894. The Meehans sued Jones to quiet title.
The Supreme Court affirmed for the Meehans. When a treaty reserves land for a chief, it held, the treaty itself converts the land into individual property: "equivalent to a present grant of a complete title in fee simple," unless the treaty limits it. Treaties with tribes are read in the sense in which "they would naturally be understood by the Indians." Inheritance of the land was controlled by the tribe's laws, usages and customs, not state law or the Secretary of the Interior, so it passed to the eldest son.
The 1894 resolution and the Interior Department's later action could not divest rights already acquired under the lease.
Summarized with AI assistance from 3 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error
What the sources say, and how this was checked
Well supported by the sources below.
in the sense in which they would naturally be understood by the Indians
Jones v. Meehan, 175 U.S. 1 (1899) (U.S. Reports, Library of Congress)having descended, upon his death, by the laws, customs and usages of the tribe, to his eldest son and successor as chief
Jones v. Meehan, 175 U.S. 1 (1899) (U.S. Reports, Library of Congress)is controlled by the laws, usages and customs of the tribe, and not by the law ot the State in which the land lies
Jones v. Meehan, 175 U.S. 1 (1899) (U.S. Reports, Library of Congress)
Research notes. The U.S. Reports text is a scanned copy with errors (for example 'ot' for 'of' in a quoted line). The phrase 'equivalent to a present grant of a complete title in fee simple' is quoted from the syllabus, where the printed text breaks 'pres- ent' across a line. The case is about title to a strip along the Red Lake River at Thief River Falls; the opinion does not discuss the Chippewa bands' present land base.
Who is doing the work
This history belongs to living nations. Start with them:
- Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians of the Bad River Reservation, Wisconsin
- Bay Mills Indian Community
- Chippewa Cree Indians of the Rocky Boy's Reservation, Montana
- Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians, Michigan
- Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin
- Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa
- Lac Vieux Desert Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of Michigan
- Little Shell Tribe of Chippewa Indians of Montana
Working with these nations
- Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife Commission (GLIFWC) Nation government Ojibwe treaty rights in ceded territories, natural resource stewardship, manoomin, and a Land Conservancy program… Give on their site Website
- Honor the Earth Native-led Pipeline resistance, sovereignty, energy justice Give on their site Website
- White Earth Land Recovery Project (WELRP) Native-led Recover the original White Earth reservation land base Give on their site Website
- Native Land Conservancy (Massachusetts) Native-led Native-led land conservation Give on their site Website
Native legal and land defense, nationally
- Native American Rights Fund (NARF) Native-led Litigation and legal advocacy for tribal sovereignty, treaty rights, land and resources Give on their site Website
- NDN Collective (LANDBACK Campaign) Native-led LANDBACK campaign (launched 2020; Mount Rushmore closure and return of Black Hills public lands), Indigenous… Give on their site Website
- Indian Land Tenure Foundation (ILTF) Native-led Land recovery and control by tribes and individual Indian landowners Website
- Decolonizing Wealth Project (Indigenous Earth Fund; California Tribal Land Return) Native-led Reparative philanthropy Give on their site Website
Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.
Connections
Links marked “suggested” were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.
Doctrine applied 2
Concerns the instrument 1
Policy era 1
- Allotment and Assimilation1887suggested
Nations named 1
- Chippewa (Ojibwe)suggested
Sources
- supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/175/1/legal text copy
The record’s fields
- Holding
- A treaty can convey alienable fee title to an individual tribal member without a patent; a treaty 'must therefore be construed not according to the technical meaning of its words to learned lawyers'.verified
- Kind
- Court case
- Confidence
- High